"

Introduction to DEIA in OER for Social Justice

1.3 Finding Your Lens: Language, Theory, and Equity

Karna Younger and Theresa Huff

Power, Words, and Learning

When writing for DEIA, it’s important to unpack the relationship between power, white supremacy, representation, and language in OER. Recentering educational power involves not only the inclusion of the words and stories of historically marginalized peoples but also the voices of those who lived those experiences, as Sarah Lambert has argued.

As an author you want to empower students to think critically with terminology that is accurate and reflects the true histories of diverse identities and experiences. How to do so begins with your intentional choices from the wording of your learning outcomes through your inclusion of topics and perspectives.

How do I find the ‘Right’ Words? 

As an author, writing for DEIA is about writing from a place of awareness: you’re taking a critical look at our society, engaging histories of oppression, and challenging students and educators to have real conversations about social inequalities. One way you can begin to understand the importance of word choice in your OER is to think about power and who holds it. In DEIA, we talk a lot about power dynamics when it comes to topics like systems of oppression, inequality, privilege, white supremacy, and structural racism. The terms that we use when talking about race, ethnicity, gender, sexuality, and religion are rarely benign. But the common thread that weaves these topics together are words that have been used to justify these systems and enforce the marginalization of certain individuals and groups of people. In this context, you are building your OER.

Tackling Theory 

You are a member of the OERFSJ cohort because of your experiences with centering DEIA in your teaching and approach to your discipline. From your mindset of an antiracist and intersectional professor your word choice will follow. Here, let’s discuss creating OER with two social theories (Seidman 2016) likely familiar to you. Social theories are frameworks used in social science and humanities disciplines to analyze, explain, and understand social structures, power dynamics, and cultural norms. There are many social theories to choose from, but we’ll focus on two that are the foreground of your equity lens: Critical Race Theory and Intersectionality.

Critical Race Theory

Critical Race Theory (CRT) and Intersectionality highlight how power structures in the United States privilege and disadvantage people. CRT was developed by Derrick Bell, Kimberlé Crenshaw, and Richard Delgado. As scholars in the legal field, Bell, Crenshaw, and Delgado sought to underscore the role of race and racism embedded in the political, social, and economic structures of the United States. What makes CRT unique is its emphasis on both theory and practice:

“[CRT} cannot be confined to a static and narrow definition but is considered to be an evolving and malleable practice. It critiques how the social construction of race and institutionalized racism perpetuate a racial caste system that relegates people of color to the bottom tiers. CRT also recognizes that race intersects with other identities, including sexuality, gender identity, and others.” (George, 2021).

While CRT emphasizes race, your textbook will undoubtedly include topics related to gender, sexuality, religion, disability, and more. This is where intersectionality becomes important.

Intersectionality

Intersectionality was first coined in 1989 by Crenshaw. The legal scholar and civil rights advocate originally highlighted the importance of centering the experience of African American women at the intersection of both racism and sexism (hence the term: intersectionality), but scholars have applied Crenshaw’s theory of intersectionality to a range of issues like gender, class, and disability.

While intersectionality is a crucial component of your equity lens, it’s important to note that it’s not a “grand theory of everything” (Crenshaw 2017). Intersectionality is your starting point for understanding why equity is important: we all hold multiple identities, and each of those identities can contribute to unique, varying experiences of inequality and oppression.

What's This Tool? - H5P Interactive Video

From theory to OER: recognitive and representational justice

Using such theories, Sarah Lambert called for OER that centralize social justice. As you will recall from your evaluation of OER, Lambert’s recognitive and representational justice elements provide us with a needed framework to improve and create OER. As a refresher, featuring the faces and cases of people of color in OER is an “act of recognitive justice.” Such showcasing, however, may perpetuate the higher education’s systematic history of being white-dominated and male-centric. As a result, Lambert pushes OER creators toward representational justice: the “self-determination of marginalised [sic] people and groups to speak for themselves, and not have their stories told by others.” Representational justice calls for the power dynamic to shift. No longer are historically marginalized groups the subject being studied, they are the authors controlling the narrative and bringing greater understanding to complex topics.

Use the interactive slide deck below to look at two problematic examples and consider strategies for improving course materials through recognitive and representational justice. You’ll read two passages, one from a McGraw Hill World Geography textbook (2016), and the other from Mexican American Heritage (Riddle, 2017).

 

What's This Tool? - H5P Course Presentation

Reflection: How can you integrate representational justice?

Resources

George, J. (2021). A lesson on critical race theory.  American Bar Association.

World Geography. (2016). McGraw Hill.

News from Columbia Law School. (2017). Crenshaw on intersectionality, more than two decades later.

NAACP Legal Defence and Educational Fund. (2023). What is critical race theory?

Riddle, J., Angle, V. (2017). Mexican American Heritage. Momentum Instruction, LLC.

University of Washington Department of Epidemiology Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Committee. (2019). Glossary of equity, diversity, and inclusion terms.

Crenshaw, Kimberlé. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum: Vol. 1989: Iss. 1, Article 8. 

Crenshaw, K. (2016). The urgency of intersectionality [Video]. TEDWomen Conference. 

Additional Reading (and Listening):

Brown McNair, T., Bensimon, E.M. & Malcolm-Piqueux, L. (2020). From equity talk to equity walk: Expanding practitioner knowledge for racial justice in higher education. Jossey-Bass.

Crenshaw, K. (2022). Intersectionality matters! [Podcast]. African American Policy Forum.

Crenshaw, K. (2017). On intersectionality: Essential writings. The New Press.

Crenshaw, K., Gotanda, N., Pellar, G. & Thomas, K. (eds.) (1996). Critical race theory: The key writings that formed a movement. The New Press.

Delgado, R. & Stefancic, J. (2012). Critical Race Theory: An Introduction. New York University Press.

DiAngelo, R. (2018). White fragility: Why it’s so hard for white people to talk about racism. Beacon Press.

EducationWeek. (2021). Spotlight on critical race theory. Editorial Projects in Education, Inc.

Open for Antiracism Program. (n.d.) Community College Consortium for OER.

Tatum, B.D. (2017). Why are all the black kids sitting together in the cafeteria?: And other conversations about race. Basic Books.

 

 

Licenses and Attributions

“Finding Your Lens: Language, Theory, and Equity” by Theresa Huff and Karna Younger is adapted from “Finding Your Lens: Language, Theory, and Equity” by Heather Blicher and Valencia Scott for Open Oregon Educational Resources, used under CC BY 4.0. “Finding Your Lens: Language, Theory, and Equity” is licensed under CC BY 4.0.

 

 

definition

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Open Voices, Just Choices: OER for Social Justice Faculty Handbook Copyright © by Karna Younger and Theresa Huff is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.