Hiking Together: Open Pedagogy

Cultivating a Caring Community

Learning Objectives

By the end of this chapter, you will be able to

  • Relate open pedagogy practices to one of your existing assignments or current teaching practices
So-Cal, Nor-Cal, No-Cost on green circular background with blue, green, red, and orange text and poppy and evergreen tree graphics
For more OER marketing materials, see Growing Your OER Program: A Marketing and Advocacy Toolkit.

Using OER shouldn’t just be about saving your students money. Let’s talk about how open education can transform the ways you teach through representational justice.[1] The inclusion of student work in your OER will not only keep it updated and relevant to your most important users, but also increase learners’ sense of belonging in your course.[2] In this chapter, we will define open pedagogy through its common attributes and discuss why students are motivated by this inclusive practice. We will wrap up with some general advice for how to build a caring community before asking you to reflect on how all this relates to your teaching.

What is Open Pedagogy?

Teachers have been practicing open pedagogy for decades[3]. Despite this passage of time, however, and as we will discuss in the next chapter, there isn’t a common definition. Instead, open pedagogy is often defined by common practices and values. Many open pedagogy practices are rooted in familiar assignments reimagined to make courses more transparent and inclusive, to support students in peer-to-peer learning, or to introduce digital tools to improve students’ critical digital literacy.

Here are some examples of open pedagogy practice that include students:

  • Creating projects focused on social justice with critical digital pedagogy skills[4];
  • Designing slide decks for a general Psychology course;[5]
  • Collaborating on a shared annotated bibliography;[6]
  • Benefiting from a variety of skill-building social learning projects.[7]

If aspects of these projects sound familiar to you, chances are you have practiced elements of it as a learner or teacher. You may have asked students to publicly present their work, create and show a film, publish a newspaper article in the campus newspaper, or research and reflect on a local community project. All of these are iterations of open pedagogy.

Attributes of open pedagogy

Despite the diversity of open pedagogy assignments, Bronwyn Hegarty has traced eight attributes that often formulate open pedagogy assignments. Use the tutorial below to learn more about Hegarty’s characteristics and reflect on how they might relate to your own teaching practices. Let’s read through these common elements to better understand open pedagogy.

Select the plus signs (+) on the image to learn about each of the eight attributes. 

Select the arrow to view an accessible version of the Attributes of Open Pedagogy interactivity.

Attributes of Open Pedagogy

Image Description: Diagram illustrating the eight attributes of open pedagogy. “Open Pedagogy” appears in the center and is connected to eight surrounding attributes: Participatory Technology, Innovation and Creativity, Sharing Ideas and Resources, Reflective Practice, People, Openness and Trust, Connected Community, Learner Generated, and Peer Review.

Attributes are defined in hotspots as follows:

  • Participating Technologies: Technologies used to promote participation. “Technically speaking it is the use of blogs; wikis; video, photo, and audio sharing sites; forums, chats, and even email, that combine into what more interestingly becomes socially constructed media”.[8]
  • Innovation and Creativity: In the 2015 NMC Horizon report, the emphasis is on using educational technologies to develop innovative models of learning that personalize experiences and incorporate new opportunities for using the dearth of open, accessible content and informal learning opportunities.[9] Increased opportunities for learning in the workplace and obtaining qualifications through assessment of existing competency and knowledge presented in portfolios are considered viable outcomes for personalized learning.
  • Sharing Ideas and Resources: Sharing resources provides a wider and richer array of material for educators and learners to access and strengthens the learning experience. The possibility that peers will scrutinize resources that are shared may result in better quality and more valuable resources being made available. Also, pedagogical innovation is more likely when alternatives to development are available and when people can see what is possible, and how easily it can be done.[10]
  • Reflective Practice: A vital component of reflective practice is feedback from peers, which, if exploited, can lead to transformational change. Peer review is a natural consequence of such a community and facilitates the integration of professional learning and reflection into everyday activities, leading to intuitive, reflective practice.[11]
  • People, Openness, Trust: In open networks, Mak, Williams, and Mackness consider that students’ willingness to learn is fragile, with participation and interactions unlikely to flourish unless an element of trust can be built. In the Connectivism and Connective Knowledge MOOC, they found that the blogging environment was preferred over forum interactions, due to negative experiences encountered by participants. This reduced opportunities for engaging in an open, trusting, and diverse learning environment, and interactions in the course became less engaging as more and more participants became blog refugees.[12]
  • Connected Community: A connected community is not only essential for collaboration and sharing resources, but also it is an indication of a participatory culture. To participate in a connected community, the conduit of social media or other technological systems is needed. According to the 2015 NMC Horizon report, over the next four to five years students will be able to connect at will to a global network—termed the “Internet of Things”—and this will have implications for education as we know it.[13]
  • Learner Generated: When considering how OER can move into the OEPosphere (Open Educational Practice sphere), a willingness to manipulate learning experiences to suit an openness philosophy is key. This requires ‘opening’ up the process to empower students to take the lead, solve problems, and work collectively to produce artifacts that they share, discuss, reconfigure, and redeploy. When students are encouraged to become fully involved in the learning process, something “magical” happens and some imaginative work can be produced.[14]
  • Peer Review: Technologies representative of the social participatory Web naturally lead to more open practices that inspire learner-generated content, peer critique, and collective aggregation, where the material collated or created by individuals can be augmented by the wider community through peer feedback, tagging, sharing, and modification (Conole, 2014). Both tight-knit COPs and more loosely functioning ‘gatherings’ or networks are forming to share knowledge and comment on each other’s work. Conole (2014) has integrated the trend for openness into her 7C learning design framework using OER and collaborative practices. She sees learners as publishers and users of a range of open tools, with peer interactions and critique embedded in the learning experience. Even so, designing for a socially connected learning experience, as discussed earlier, does not necessarily lead to full engagement or participation.[15]

Why practice open pedagogy?

Now that you have a sense of what constitutes open pedagogy, let’s briefly go over some of the reasons why open pedagogy will serve you and your students. Let’s start with the facts. Practitioners have validated the efficacy of open pedagogy through numerous research studies analyzing student perception and academic performance.

Let’s start with improved learning. Hilton and company found students preferred learning with open pedagogy rather than traditional papers and tests.[16] A number of open pedagogy and OER studies have found open pedagogy affords students the opportunity to think critically and engage in more holistic learning that relates to their lived experiences and amplifies their voices beyond the classroom.[17]

“It was more hands-on. It didn’t feel like ‘traditional’ learning. Rather, it was more interactive and felt more ‘life-like’ enabling me to learn the material, while also gaining real life skills,” reported a student learning with open pedagogy.[18]Sharing work publicly can positively motivate students to share their perspectives for the common good. Learners capitalizing on the choice of publicly sharing their work voiced greater agency[19]. With more opportunities to self-represent their identities in their learning. In alignment with Sarah R. Lambert’s representational justice, such students wanted to “share their stories and speak from their experiences” because of “the value of the knowledge in them and wanting to help others,” according to Virginia Clinton-Lisell and Lindsey Gwozdz.[20]. Learners capitalizing on the choice of publicly sharing their work voiced greater agency[21] With such positive experiences, it should be no surprise that students report “increased engagement and skills acquisition,” as students co-creating with Eric Werth and Katherine Williams did.[22]

With such positive student feedback, perhaps it is not surprising that open pedagogy is gaining traction as an equity strategy in education.[23] Adherents find the student-driven approach to open pedagogy fosters a greater sense of belonging in higher education for racial-ethnic minority and first-generation U.S. college students.[24]

How do you practice open pedagogy?

We firmly believe that students, especially marginalized students or those from underserved communities, would not report such favorable experiences exerting their agency with open pedagogy if it weren’t for the caring, trusting, and inclusive communities built by their instructors.

Care

Care will be an undercurrent throughout our discussion of open pedagogy. During our introduction to open education, you may recall we discussed the CARE Framework for OER, which asks members of the OER community to express their care for each other by contributing, attributing, releasing, and empowering their own and each other’s work. The CARE Framework is applicable to your work with students.

Care is not a new concept to education, and Maha Bali, a leading open pedagogist, draws parallels between open pedagogy and the critical writings of bell hooks as well as hooks’s [centralization of care to building learning communities with students.[25] Reflecting on her servant approach to teaching, hooks saw “committed acts of caring” as a way “to create the conditions for freedom” so that students could combat oppressive or dominating elements of educational systems.[26]

Caring educators open the mind, allowing students to embrace a world of knowing that is always subject to change and challenge.”    bell hooks[27]

But what do committed acts of caring look like? Deirdre Maultsaid and Michelle Harrison offer some how-to advice for building caring relationships with and among students through care and open pedagogy:[28]

Select the plus sign (+) next to each word to read the advice for each.

While these are helpful tips, there is no perfect script for practicing open pedagogy.

It is important to note that care is not just for your students. It is for you as well. A pedagogy of care allows for vulnerability, encourages empathy and aid during times of struggle, Bali shares.[29] Modeling such attentive behavior encouraged Bali’s students to mirror it in their treatment of not just Bali but their greater learning communities. For instance, when Bali fell ill during the pandemic, her students sent her their healing tips and volunteered to help during class. Through such reciprocal care, faculty and students are able to remove barriers for learning and thriving, building more equitable educational systems for each other. This mutual grace is important as you and your students learn what open pedagogy looks like in the context of your courses.

Ultimately, “open pedagogy involves centering care, empathy, and flexibility so that navigating these new learning experiences can lead to your own empowerment and growth,” summarized Jamie Witman, open educational practice specialist for the Open Education Network.[30] Let’s engage with this empowerment and growth as we explore open pedagogy.

Your Turn: Reframe Your Practices

Use this space to reflect on how the eight attributes of open pedagogy and the concept of care relate to your current teaching practices. Use the arrows to navigate the tutorial and consider exporting and saving your reflection for your own use. OERFSJ will not retain a copy. 

 

With this sentiment in the next chapters, we will define what open pedagogy could mean for your teaching practice and discuss practical ways to redesign and implement an assignment with students’ well-being and privacy in mind.

License

This work is adapted from Benefits of Open Pedagogy in The Open Pedagogy Student Toolkit by The Open Education Network under CC BY 4.0.

Note: The content of the handbook’s open pedagogy section is designed to accompany the Open Pedagogy Learning Circle Curriculum by the Open Education Network. CC BY 4.0


  1. Sarah R. Lambert, “Changing Our (Dis)Course: A Distinctive Social Justice Aligned Definition of Open Education,” Journal of Learning for Development 5, no. 3 (2018): 225–244, https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v5i3.290
  2. Amy T. Nusbaum, “Who Gets to Wield Academic Mjolnir?: On Worthiness, Knowledge Curation, and Using the Power of the People to Diversify OER,” Journal of Interactive Media in Education 2020, no. 1 (2020): 4, https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.559
  3. Tannis Morgan, “Open Pedagogy and a Very Brief History of the Concept,” in EdTech in the Wild: Critical Blog Posts on Educational Technology, ed. Royce Kimmons (EdTech Books, 2019), https://edtechbooks.org/wild/open_pedagogy
  4. Elaine Kaye and Nicole Wilson, “Creating Learning Spaces for Social Justice Projects: Applying the Values of Critical Digital Pedagogy and Open Pedagogy,” in Pedagogy Opened: Innovative Theory and Practice, ed. Tiffani Tijerina (Dahlonega, GA: University of North Georgia Press, 2024), 1–48, https://alg.manifoldapp.org/read/pedagogy-opened-v1-a1
  5. Victoria C. Taylor and Jeffrey Potter, Psychology in My Life Compendium: Collection of Student Created Slide Decks and Essays for General Psychology Courses at Prince George's Community College, Open Education Network Open Pedagogy Portal, published August 21, 2023, https://oen-openpedportal.pubpub.org/psychology
  6. Open Pedagogy Notebook. “Students Creating a Shared Annotated Bibliography.” Open Pedagogy Notebook. Accessed July 21, 2026. https://openpedagogy.org/assignment/students-creating-a-shared-annotated-bibliography/
  7. Catherine Cronin, “Openness and Praxis: Exploring the Use of Open Educational Practices in Higher Education,” The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 18, no. 5 (2017), https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3096
  8. Blackall, L. (2011a). Participatory culture. In L. Blackall & B. Hegarty (Eds.), Open education practices: A user guide for organizations/models of open education; http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Open_Education_Practices:_A_User_Guide_for_Organisations/Resources_and_Practices#Participatory_culture
  9. Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2015). NMC Horizon Report: 2015 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium; http://www.nmc.org/publication-type/horizon-report/ .
  10. Educause. (2010). 7 things you should know about Open Educational Resources; http://www.educause.edu/eli
  11. Hegarty, B. (2014a). Part One: Open Pedagogy: A model for Open Education Practice. Bronwyn on Education; http://bahtings.blogspot.com/2014/05/part-one-open-pedagogy-model-for-open.html
  12. Mak, S. F., Williams, R., & Mackness, J. (2010). Blogs and forums as communication and learning tools in a MOOC. In L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, V. Hodgson, C. Jones, M. de Laat, D. McConnell, & T. Ryberg (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Networked Learning 2010 (pp. 275–284); http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fss/organisations/ netlc/past/nlc2010/abstracts/PDFs/Mak.pdf
  13. Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada,V., & Freeman, A. (2015). NMC Horizon Report: 2015 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium; http://www.nmc.org/ publication-type/horizon-report/
  14. Ehlers, U-D., & Conole, G. (2010). Open Educational Practices: Unleashing the power of OER; http://www.icde.org/filestore/ Resources/OPAL/OPALEhlersConoleNamibia.pdf
  15. Conole, G. (2014). The 7Cs of learning design: A new approach to rethinking design practice. In S. Bayne, C. Jones, M. de Laat, T. Ryberg, & C. Sinclair, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Networked Learning 2014, Edinburgh (pp. 502–509); http://www.networkedlearningconference.org.uk/info/confpapers.htm.
  16. John Hilton III, David Wiley, Reta Chaffee, Jennifer Darrow, JoAnn Guilmett, Sarah Harper, and Bryson Hilton, “Student Perceptions of Open Pedagogy: An Exploratory Study,” Open Praxis 11, no. 3 (2019): 275–288, https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.11.3.973
  17. Open Education Group. “Publications by OEG.” Accessed July 21, 2026. https://openedgroup.org/publications/
  18. John Hilton III, David Wiley, Reta Chaffee, Jennifer Darrow, JoAnn Guilmett, Sarah Harper, and Bryson Hilton, “Student Perceptions of Open Pedagogy: An Exploratory Study,” Open Praxis 11, no. 3 (2019): 275–288, https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.11.3.973
  19. Virginia Clinton-Lisell and Lindsey Gwozdz, “Understanding Student Experiences of Renewable and Traditional Assignments,” College Teaching 71, no. 2 (2023): 125–134, https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2023.2179591; Eric Werth and Katherine Williams, “What Motivates Students About Open Pedagogy? Motivational Regulation Through the Lens of Self-Determination Theory,” The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 22, no. 3 (2021): 34–54, https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v22i3.5373).
  20. Virginia Clinton-Lisell and Lindsey Gwozdz, “Understanding Student Experiences of Renewable and Traditional Assignments,” College Teaching 71, no. 2 (2023): 125–134, https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2023.2179591
  21. Virginia Clinton-Lisell and Lindsey Gwozdz, “Understanding Student Experiences of Renewable and Traditional Assignments,” College Teaching 71, no. 2 (2023): 125–134, https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2023.2179591
  22. Eric Werth and Katherine Williams, “What Motivates Students About Open Pedagogy? Motivational Regulation Through the Lens of Self-Determination Theory,” The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 22, no. 3 (2021): 34–54, https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v22i3.5373)
  23. Francisca Rocha Lourenço, Rita Oliveira, and Oksana Tymoshchuk, “How Can Open Educational Resources Promote Equity in Education?” in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies for Ageing Well and e-Health (ICT4AWE 2024) (SciTePress, 2024), 132–139, https://doi.org/10.5220/0012586500003699
  24. Maithreyi Gopalan and Shannon T. Brady, “College Students’ Sense of Belonging: A National Perspective,” Educational Researcher 49, no. 2 (2020): 134–137, https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X19897622
  25. Maha Bali and Mia Zamora, “Intentionally Equitable Hospitality as Critical Instructional Design,” in Designing for Care, ed. Jerod Quinn, Martha Burtis, and Surita Jhangiani (Denver, CO: Hybrid Pedagogy Inc., 2022), https://pressbooks.pub/designingforcare/chapter/intentionally-equitable-hospitality-as-critical-instructional-design/; Maha Bali, “Pedagogy of Care: Caring for Teachers,” Reflecting Allowed (blog), April 13, 2021, https://blog.mahabali.me/pedagogy/critical-pedagogy/pedagogy-of-care-caring-for-teachers/; bell hooks, Teaching Community: A Pedagogy of Hope (New York: Routledge, 2003), 83, https://books.google.com/books?id=S5ySGySXJAYC
  26. hooks, Teaching Community, 92.
  27. hooks, Teaching community, 92.
  28. Deirdre Maultsaid and Michelle Harrison, “Can Open Pedagogy Encourage Care? Student Perspectives,” The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 24, no. 3 (2023): 77–98, https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v24i3.6901
  29. Maha Bali. (2021, April 13). Pedagogy of care: Caring for teachers. Reflecting Allowed. https://blog.mahabali.me/pedagogy/critical-pedagogy/pedagogy-of-care-caring-for-teachers/
  30. Jamie Witman, “Benefits of Open Pedagogy,” in The Open Pedagogy Student Toolkit (Open Education Network, 2023), https://pressbooks.pub/openpedstudenttoolkit/chapter/benefits-of-open-pedagogy/

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Open Voices, Just Choices: OER for Social Justice Faculty Handbook Copyright © 2025 by Theresa Huff and Karna Younger is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.