Charting Your Route: Mapping and Planning

Getting the Lay of the Land: Reviewing OER and Course Outcomes

Learning Objectives

By the end of this chapter, you will be able to

  • Analyze how course outcomes inform the structure, scope, and priorities of your OER design
  • Organize your OER into chapters and sections

The Lay of the Land

a wide valley with rolling, field and tree covered hills and a river running to the horizon
Figure 3.2.1. Trail architects, like OER architects, start by studying the lay of the land or scope of the OER.

If you followed our Itinerary, you likely performed a gap analysis of existing OER with considerations of the best fit for your course and your students. This survey of the metaphorical “land” through which you plan to create your OER helped you begin to identify some of the parameters, constraints, and missing pieces, such as adequate DEIA content.

You can’t shape a good trail until you’ve walked the land, studying what is already there, noticing natural paths and marking places worth returning to.

Why This Matters

Taking time to design the OER surfaces constraints early prevents overdesign (adding more content, tools, or structure than your learners need) and unrealistic expectations. Research on cognitive load shows that when instructional design ignores practical constraints, it can place unnecessary mental demands on learners and instructors, reducing clarity and effectiveness rather than supporting learning.[1]

Start With the Outcome(s) in Mind

The first stage of Backward Design[2] is to identify what you want your students to be able to do by the end. Before you decide what content your OER will need to include, you will need to find and identify the outcomes of the course(s) in which it will be used. Whether you are creating this OER for use in one course or several different courses, start by finding a list of the course outcomes.

Course Outcome Example

By the end of this course, students will be able to…

Course Outcome 1 (CO-1): Research, organize, and develop informative speeches that are adapted to specific audiences.

Course outcomes can help you identify content you will need to provide your students (like “informative speeches” that have been adapted to specific audiences in the example above).

But when designing your OER, course outcomes act like the borders and trailheads of your trail system, defining the purpose, scope, and starting and end points of your OER. All other chapter-level learning objectives, content, and assessments map to and support those course outcomes.

Introducing the Map

Just as a trail architect uses maps and blueprints for designing the system of trails, OER architects need a visual tool to map out their many-layered plan of their OER. To help you map your route with purpose, we’ve created a customizable OERFSJ Mapping Spreadsheet [Website](with optional Word doc versions) to guide your planning. The chapters following this provide in-depth rationale, examples, and practice of mapping the design of your own OER, and the spreadsheet itself also contains concise versions of the guidance.

 

Select the arrow to view the parts of the OERFSJ Mapping Spreadsheet.

There are four tabs in the OERFSJ Mapping Spreadsheet [Website].

A start here tab from a Google Spreadsheet with guidance for using the spreadsheet
Figure 3.2.2. The Start Here tab gives simple guidance for how to use the spreadsheet for Backward Design of your OER.
Google spreadsheet with step-by-step directions for each column of each of the three sections for Backward Design
Figure 3.2.3. The Directions tab gives column-by-column steps for completing the Table of Contents, aligning assessments, and aligning content using Backward Design for your OER.
Completed map of OER using the OERFSJ excel spreadsheet template
Figure 3.2.4. The Sample tab offers an example of a completed Backward Design map of OER by the Yang Team.
A Google spreadsheet template with three sections for designing with Backward Design
Figure 3.2.5. The OER Content and Assessment Map tab contains a template for the Backward Design of your OER.

 

OER for Social Justice Faculty Team Highlight

green cover of human physiology textbook
Figure 3.2.6. Human Physiology 

 

The Bach Team designed their Human Physiology OER following the guidance in this part. An additional benefit was how easily the OER text was to implement in their classroom: 

Using the OER did not require significant changes to our teaching practices or course design, as it was intentionally aligned with the structure and pedagogy already in place.”  -Bach Team

 

 

Your Turn: Getting the Lay of Your Land

  1. Take a few minutes to download your map template (the OERFSJ Mapping Spreadsheet [Website]) and create a folder (shared, if working with a team) in which to store it.
  2. Gather your course outcome(s) from your course syllabi and place them either in a new column in your map template or in a document in your shared folder.
  3. Work through the course outcome reflection below to help you gain a better sense of what you have, what you need, and – if you are working with a team- gain a shared understanding of these outcomes.

Organizing Your OER

Now that you have discovered topics and perhaps themes that will help you to cluster those topics into logical groups and sequences, we’ll begin to map the organization of your OER. Just as a trail architect divides the park land into sections based on its terrain, you will divide your OER into logical sections.

While we tend to create traditional textbooks in chapters with several pages, in Pressbooks, these are called different names. In a Pressbook, each Part can hold several chapters, and each Chapter is one scrollable page. For example, if you select this Pressbook’s Table of Contents, you’ll see this chapter (Getting the Lay of the Land: Reviewing OER and Course Outcomes) is one of several chapters in a Part called Charting Your Route: Mapping and Planning. This series of Parts and Chapters will become your Table of Contents.

As you map your OER Table of Contents, you’ll be focusing mainly on chapters and potential chapter sections, so don’t worry too much right now about the Pressbooks structure. Just know that later on you may group some of your chapters into larger Parts within your own Pressbooks.

Your Turn: Dividing Your Land into Sections

Four, green Google spreadsheet columns for mapping a Table of Contents
Figure 3.2.7. The first four columns of the OERFSJ Mapping Spreadsheet will help you design your Table of Contents, the learning objectives to be covered in those chapters and sections, and the author of each chapter.

 

Open your downloaded OERFSJ Mapping Spreadsheet to the OER Content and Assessment Map tab. You’ll use the first two columns (in green) to map out your OER’s Table of Contents. There are two options for completing your Table of Contents.

Option A

If you already know the sequence of the topics of your OER, start with Option A, Step 1 and Step 2.

Step 1

In column A, order your chapters by title – one per spreadsheet cell in column A. Keep in mind that, typically, instruction moves from the simple to the more complex (foundations, theories, and background first, moving to examples, application, etc.). When creating the Table of Contents, you will want to answer the following question: In what order do I want to guide my students through the content?

Step 2

In column B, list the main topics that will be covered in this chapter. These will become your chapter’s sections and eventually the heading titles you’ll use in your chapter to break up the content.

Keep in mind that this is the design stage, and you can always remove, rearrange, and rename these items later.

Option B

If you aren’t sure yet what the exact organization of your OER will be, start with the learning objectives (Option B – Start here) and move on to the next chapter on creating measurable learning objectives to get started.

Now that you have the lay of the land, it’s time to choose the “destinations for your students by setting measurable, student-centered objectives.


  1. Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive Load Theory. New York, NY: Springer.
  2. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. ASCD.
definition

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Open Voices, Just Choices: OER for Social Justice Faculty Handbook Copyright © 2025 by Theresa Huff and Karna Younger is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.